Crossplane Sovereignty: Infrastructure-as-Code After the License Wars

Your infrastructure-as-code tool defines every resource in your cloud environment — networks, databases, storage, secrets, IAM policies. Whoever controls the IaC platform controls the blueprint of your entire infrastructure.

In August 2023, HashiCorp switched Terraform from MPL 2.0 to the Business Source License (BSL 1.1), restricting how competitors can use the software. In April 2024, IBM acquired HashiCorp for $6.4 billion, placing Terraform under a US corporation with a restrictive license and CLOUD Act obligations. AWS CloudFormation, Azure ARM Templates, and Google Deployment Manager are proprietary and locked to their respective US hyperscaler ecosystems.

Crossplane is a CNCF Graduated project (Apache 2.0 license), Kubernetes-native, and governed by the same foundation that oversees Kubernetes itself. VSHN operates Crossplane on Swiss infrastructure and is a listed Crossplane commercial vendor.

Why Crossplane is the sovereign infrastructure-as-code choice

The HashiCorp acquisition crystallized a risk that was always present with single-vendor open source:

Crossplane sovereignty compared

Dimension Terraform (HashiCorp/IBM) AWS CloudFormation Azure ARM / Bicep Google Deployment Manager VSHN Managed Crossplane
Governance IBM (USA) Amazon (USA) Microsoft (USA) Google (USA) CNCF (open governance)
License BSL 1.1 (restrictive) Proprietary Proprietary Proprietary Apache 2.0 (permissive)
CLOUD Act Exposed (HCP Cloud) Exposed Exposed Exposed Not exposed
State storage Terraform Cloud (IBM) or self-managed AWS-managed Azure-managed GCP-managed Kubernetes etcd (Swiss infrastructure)
Cloud lock-in Multi-cloud (but IBM-governed) AWS only Azure only GCP only Multi-cloud, Kubernetes-native
SaaS dependency Terraform Cloud for collaboration AWS Console Azure Portal GCP Console None — runs on your K8s cluster
Community governance Single company (IBM) Single company Single company Single company CNCF graduated, multi-vendor
Operator Self-managed or IBM SaaS AWS-managed Microsoft-managed Google-managed VSHN AG (Switzerland)

The license and acquisition argument

The Terraform license change and IBM acquisition illustrate a fundamental sovereignty risk with single-vendor open source:

  1. License revocation — HashiCorp changed Terraform from MPL 2.0 to BSL 1.1, restricting competing commercial use. Organizations that built their infrastructure practice around "open source Terraform" discovered the license was a single board decision away from restriction.

  2. Corporate acquisition — IBM's acquisition placed Terraform under a US defense contractor subject to the CLOUD Act, ITAR, and EAR regulations. Terraform Cloud state files — containing the complete blueprint of your infrastructure — are now accessible to IBM under US law.

  3. OpenTofu fork — the community responded with OpenTofu (Linux Foundation), but it remains a catch-up fork tied to HashiCorp's HCL design decisions and faces ongoing legal uncertainty around code provenance.

Crossplane avoids these risks structurally: - CNCF governance means no single company can change the license - Apache 2.0 is irrevocable for released versions - Kubernetes-native architecture means state lives in your cluster's etcd, not a vendor SaaS - Provider ecosystem is community-maintained, not controlled by one company

VSHN sovereignty self-assessment

We applied the EU's Cloud Sovereignty Framework (v1.2.1, October 2025) to our own services. This framework was used to score providers in the EU's EUR 180M sovereign cloud tender in April 2026 — three pure-European providers achieved SEAL-3, while a consortium involving Google Cloud scored only SEAL-2.

This is a self-assessment, not a formal SEAL certification. We publish it for transparency so customers can evaluate our sovereignty profile using the same structured criteria the EU uses.

# Dimension Weight Assessment Evidence
SOV-1 Strategic 15% Strong Swiss AG, no foreign parent, all shareholders Swiss citizens (Commercial Register)
SOV-2 Legal 10% Strong Swiss law (GTC), no CLOUD Act, EU adequacy decision
SOV-3 Data & AI 10% Strong Swiss DCs by default. Sovereign key management via Managed OpenBao + Swiss HSM
SOV-4 Operational 15% Strong Swiss 24/7 ops, Swiss-only support option. All services on vanilla Kubernetes
SOV-5 Supply Chain 20% Strong Infrastructure-agnostic — customer chooses provider. Open-source software
SOV-6 Technology 15% Strong 100% open source. VSHN contributes to K8up (CNCF), Crossplane providers, Project Syn
SOV-7 Security 10% Strong ISO 27001, ISAE 3402 Type II, Swiss SOC. FINMA-regulated customers
SOV-8 Environmental 5% Moderate DC operators: Green Datacenter AG (ISO 22301/27001/27701), Exoscale sustainability. VSHN CSR policy

Overall: SEAL-3 equivalent — the same level achieved by the winners of the EU's own sovereignty tender. No provider worldwide achieved SEAL-4, as it requires fully EU/EEA-sourced hardware supply chains and open-source foundations — structural gaps shared by every cloud provider.

Get a sovereignty assessment for your infrastructure-as-code

Still on Terraform after the IBM acquisition? We assess your sovereignty profile against the EU framework and plan a migration to Crossplane on Swiss infrastructure. VSHN is a listed Crossplane commercial vendor and active upstream contributor.

Contact us

Ready to manage cloud infrastructure with Crossplane? Contact us for a free initial consultation. Consulting at CHF 250 per hour, scoped to your needs. Want to hear from a customer first? We can arrange a reference call.

Book a free call

Or send us a message